JI
JI
CASE STUDY · GOOGLE ADS

Reducing Customer Acquisition Cost Using Google Ads Optimization

A structural rebuild of a Google Ads account cut blended CAC by 44% while holding volume.

#google ads#cac#b2b#sqls
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

By re-architecting campaigns around SQL-value and killing wasted match-type spend, a mid-market SaaS cut CAC from $1,180 to $660 without losing pipeline.

A scale-up Fintech SaaS operating in the Fintech SaaS space.

OBJECTIVES
  • Cut CAC without giving up SQL volume.
  • Reallocate spend from broad match to intent-locked terms.
  • Bring SQL-value into Google as the primary conversion signal.
CHALLENGES & INITIAL SITUATION

The team had inconsistent execution across channels, no shared dashboard, and no repeatable framework for prioritizing investment.

  • 60% of spend was in broad match with no SQL feedback loop.
  • Every campaign optimized to raw form fills, not qualified pipeline.
  • PMax was cannibalizing branded volume unnoticed.
MARKETING AUDIT
  • No documented ICP or JTBD anchored to marketing programs.
  • KPIs tracked in isolation, not tied to revenue outcomes.
  • Tool sprawl with 4+ overlapping platforms and no single source of truth.
  • Content and paid teams operating on separate roadmaps.
STRATEGY
  • Rebuilt account into intent-locked ad groups with tight negatives.
  • Streamed offline SQL values into Google via enhanced conversions.
  • Isolated brand into its own campaign with capped spend.
  • Introduced a weekly wasted-spend review and negative-keyword sprint.
IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE
  1. 1
    Discovery & Audit
    Weeks 1–2

    Baseline every metric that matters.

    • Current-state audit
    • ICP + JTBD document
    • KPI tree
  2. 2
    Strategy & Planning
    Weeks 3–4

    Define bets, sequence, and ownership.

    • Quarterly roadmap
    • Framework selection
    • Executive review deck
  3. 3
    Implementation
    Weeks 5–12

    Ship the work in weekly cycles.

    • Campaigns live
    • Dashboards deployed
    • SOPs documented
  4. 4
    Measurement & Iteration
    Weeks 13+

    Compound gains with weekly review.

    • Weekly readouts
    • Experiment log
    • Next-quarter plan
EXECUTION
  • Kicked off with a 5-day baseline sprint to map current state and quick wins.
  • Locked scope for the first 90 days to prevent context switching.
  • Ran a weekly 45-minute execution review — decisions only, no status updates.
  • Stood up a live dashboard as the single source of truth for the leadership team.
CAMPAIGN ASSETS
  • Landing page system (hero, ROI proof, comparison, FAQ).
  • Email nurture sequence (7 emails across 21 days).
  • Sales enablement one-pagers and battlecards.
  • Executive dashboard with weekly and monthly views.
METRICS & RESULTS
Blended CAC
-44%
Before$1,180
After$660
SQL volume
+4%
Before142/mo
After148/mo
Wasted match spend
-83%
Before$41k/mo
After$7k/mo
Cost per SQL
-44%
Before$820
After$460
BEFORE VS AFTER
BLENDED CAC
$1,180
$660
SQL VOLUME
142/mo
148/mo
WASTED MATCH SPEND
$41k/mo
$7k/mo
COST PER SQL
$820
$460
KEY LEARNINGS
  • Sending SQL-value back into Google changed which auctions Smart Bidding chased.
  • Broad match works only when your conversion signal is high-quality — most SaaS's isn't.
  • PMax needs guardrails; unchecked it eats branded and reports the credit anyway.
COMMON MISTAKES
  • Skipping the audit phase to 'move faster' — teams later rebuild the same work.
  • Confusing activity metrics with outcome metrics in weekly reviews.
  • Running too many experiments in parallel to reach statistical clarity.
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Anchor every quarter to one primary outcome metric — everything else is a leading indicator.
  • Run a monthly framework review — retire what isn't producing decisions.
  • Give one owner accountability per workstream — shared ownership stalls output.
IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST
  • Document ICP and JTBD before writing any brief.
  • Publish a single KPI tree tied to revenue.
  • Ship the dashboard before the first campaign.
  • Run a weekly 45-min decision review with the DRIs.
  • Retrospect every 30 days; adjust bets accordingly.
RESOURCES USED
  • Site's Connected Growth System framework
  • SaaS SEO Roadmap Template
  • CAC & LTV Calculator
  • Marketing Maturity Assessment
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
How long does an engagement like this take?

Most SaaS engagements produce visible outcomes in 90 days and compound over 6–12 months.

Is this replicable at earlier stages?

Yes — the framework scales down. The number of workstreams changes, not the sequence.

What's the single biggest determinant of success?

Executive commitment to one primary outcome metric for the quarter.

RELATED CASE STUDIES

Next recommended reading

TAKE THE FULL PLAYBOOK

Download the companion PDF

By re-architecting campaigns around SQL-value and killing wasted match-type spend, a mid-market SaaS cut CAC from $1,180 to $660 without losing pipeline.

Browse all case studies